Even climate change is not fair: the impact of climate change on economic outcomes
| Date | 09 December 2024 |
| Pages | 46-67 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-01-2024-0008 |
| Published date | 09 December 2024 |
| Subject Matter | Public policy & environmental management,Environmental issues,Climate change |
| Author | Vincent Tawiah,Noha Alessa |
Even climate change is not fair: the
impact of climate change on economic
outcomes
Vincent Tawiah
Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland, and
Noha Alessa
Princess Nora bint Abdul Rahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
Purpose –From generation to generation, the poor and less developed have always borne the negative
consequences of the extravagant lifestyles of the rich. The climate seems to perpetuate this injustice by
punishingthe good people with the consequences of the irresponsible acts of the wealthy.Therefore, this paper
aims to establish the relationshipbetween climate risk and carbon emissions. Then,this paper investigates the
economic consequencesof climate risk in both developedand developing countries.
Design/methodology/approach –This paper uses robusteconometrics, including fixed effect and thetwo-
step systemgeneralised method of moments, on a large sampleof 175 countries from 2008 to 2019.
Findings –Unsurprisingly,this paper found thatclimate risks are negatively associatedwith carbon emissions,
indicatingthat countries withlower emissions are moreexposed to frequent andsevere climate-relateddisasters
than thosewith higher emissions.Additionally,this paper discovered thatclimate risk has a negativeimpact on
economicdevelopment, whichis more pronounced indeveloping countries.The results are robustto alternative
measurement and econometric modelling, including the system-generalized method of moments.
Originality/value –These findings suggest that developing countries, the least contributors to climate
change, unfairlysuffer from the environmentally irresponsible actions of high-emittingdeveloped countries.
Keywords Climate change, Climate risk, Climate disaster, Carbon emission,
Developed and developing countries, Intrusion detection, Concept drift detection,
Online incremental learning
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
Historically,the world has not been fair to all countries, from civilisation to industrialisation.
This trend of unfairness has been attributedmainly to human greed and the quest for power
(Hunter, 2009). From generation to generation, the poor and less developed have always
borne the negative consequences of the extravagant lifestylesof the rich (Shue, 1993). Social
© Vincent Tawiah and Noha Alessa. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is
published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce,
distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-
commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms
of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
Conflict of Interest: There is no conflict of interest in this paper.
Funding Declaration:Princess Nourah bint AbdulrahmanUniversity Researchers Supporting Project
number (PNURSP2024R391), PrincessNourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Competing Interest Informa tion: Thereis no competing interest on the paper.
IJCCSM
17,1
46
Received 26 December 2023
Revised14 July 2024
Accepted 29 August 2024
InternationalJournal of Climate
ChangeStrategies and
Management
Vol.17 No. 1, 2025
pp. 46-67
EmeraldPublishing Limited
1756-8692
DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-01-2024-0008
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/1756-8692.htm
and political policies have structured an unfair world. During civilisation and colonisation,
rich/advanced countries engaged in human slavery to build their nations at the expense of
others (Alemazung, 2010). Other countrieswere invaded, and resources were taken for little
or no cost. In the present day, these practices continue throughforeign investment and trade,
which exploit the poor by either dumping goods or rapidly extracting resources (Glaister
et al.,2020;Jauch, 2011). As if these actions were not enough, through foreign aid and
international diplomacy, advanced countries directly or indirectly dictate how other nations
should be governed (Alesinaand Dollar, 2000).
These actions have left scars of unfairness across the world. As the world continues to
battle to heal from the unfairnessof past actions, climate change appears to create a new level
of unfairness. In recent years, the world has seen the increasing wrath of nature towards
humans through frequent disasters such as floods, droughts, bushfires and cyclones. For
example, according to Eckstein et al. (2021), from 2000 to 2019, about 11,000 climate
disasters have caused approximately 500,000 deaths and $2.56tn in property loss. Unlike
existing unfairness,such as slavery and colonisation caused by greed and the quest for power
(Alemazung, 2010), at face value, climate change appears to be a natural occurrence that
affects every country regardlessof its development status. These natural disasters are a result
of our environmental irresponsibility. However, the question remains: Are these climate
punishment actions fairly distributed based on our actions? Are countries receiving a fair
punishment for theircontributing role to climate change?
In this paper, we attempt to answer these questions by examining the global trend of carbon
emissions and climate risk. Additionally,we analyse the relationship between various economic
indicators and climate risk to identify the countries that are bearing the highest costs of climate
change. Arguably,ensuring an equitable distribution of the consequences of climate change will
be a significant factor in determining which countries will sufferthe most. Essentially, countries
with high carbon emissions should experience greater impacts from climate change.
Prior studies have established that developed countries are higher emitters than developing
countries (Galeotti and Lanza, 1999;Mahapatra and Irfan, 2021;Wu et al., 2018). For example,
Wu et al. (2018) suggest that developed countries emit more greenhouse gases because they
use a lot of electronic gadgets and travel more. Regardless of the energy efficiency of the latest
gadgets, frequent usage generates more emissions than less energy-intensive gadgets used in
developing countries. Furthermore, affluent people drive their cars and fly more, generating
high emissions (Heil and Wodon, 1997). Therefore, in fairness, developed countries should
bear more of the burden of climate change than developing countries.
Based on these arguments, we examine the relationship between carbon emission and
climate risk, as well as the economic consequences of climate risks. We use the
comprehensive measureof climate risk developed by Eckstein et al. (2021) at Germanwatch.
The climate risk measurecaptures the frequency and severity of climate risk-relateddisasters
in a country in both the long and short terms. Using a largesample of 175 countries between
2008 and 2019, we find that climate risk is negatively and significantly associated with
carbon emission, suggesting that high-emitting countries have a lower risk of climate
disaster. Thus, low-emitting countries are at a higher risk of climate-related disasters than
high-emitting countries. We also establish that climate risk negatively and significantly
impacts industrialisation,economic development and economic growth.
Further analysis demonstrates that our findings are more pronounced for developing
countries than for developed countries. Specifically, we found that climate risk does not
significantly affect developed countries, but the negative impact in developing countries is
highly significant. The probability of climate-related disasters occurring in developing
countries is high, and these risks are significantly detrimental to industrialisation, economic
International
Journal of Climate
Change Strategies
and Management
47
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations