Erratum

• Pages: xi-xiv

ERRATUM

e Journal has been informed of errors in the recent article by Sarah

Alvy.

• e errors occur on page 191, where footnote 13 should read,

“R A.G. M  N M, C G

xxii (5th ed. 2011) [hereinafter M  M].” rather than

“R A.G. M  N M, C G

xxii (5th ed. 2011) [hereinafter M  M].”

• e errors occur on page 192, where footnote 19 should read, “is list

is not exhaustive. However, this paper will focus on corporations. See

generally M  M, supra note 13, at 102.” rather than “is

list is not exhaustive. However, this paper will focus on corporations.

See generally M  M, supra note 13, at 102.”

• e errors occur on page 192, where footnote 21 should read, “is

theory demonstrates the importance of developing meaningful

relationships with primary stakeholders of the rm, not just those who

are shareholders. See omas Donaldson & Lee Preston, e Stakeholder

eory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications, 20

A  M. R. 65 (1995). See also Sandeep Gopalan &

Katrina Hogan, Ethical Transnational Corporate Activity at Home and

Abroad: A Proposal for Reforming Continuous Disclosure Obligations in

Australia and the United States, C. H. R L. R., available

at papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2443282 (nd that

“[t]he international business context has witnessed a retreat from an

exclusive focus on shareholder wealth maximization” and arguing that

stakeholder theory in the global marketplace has become popular

due to modern trends.).” rather than “is theory demonstrates the

importance of developing meaningful relationships with primary

stakeholders of the rm, not just those who are shareholders. See

omas Donaldson & Lee Preston, e Stakeholder eory of the

Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications, 20 A 

M. R. 65 (1995).”

• e errors occur on page 197, where footnote 53 should read, “See

id. (noting that “the 2013 Act now specically provides for class

action suits brought by: (i) members; or (ii) depositors of a company,