Corte IDH. Identidad de género, e igualdad y no discriminación a parejas del mismo sexo. Obligaciones estatales en relación con el cambio de nombre, la identidad de género, y los derechos derivados de un vínculo entre parejas del mismo sexo (interpretación y alcance de los artículos 1.1, 3, 7, 11.2, 13, 17, 18 y 24, en relación con el artículo 1 de la Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos). Opinión Consultiva OC-24/17 de 24 de noviembre de 2017. Serie A No. 24.
| Judgment Date | 24 November 2017 |
| Case Type | Opinión consultiva |
| Court | Inter-American Court of Human Rights |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
40 cases
-
Report IACHR. Case No. 12.441 (Venezuela)
...v. United Kingdom, J. of 29 M., 1979, Series A no. 30, para. 65; y Eur. C.H., C.o..H. v. United Kingdom, Judgment of 7 December, 1976, Series A No. 24, para. 49.O.N.U., Comité de Derechos Humanos, Aduayom y otros c. Togo (422/1990, 423/1990 y 424/1990), dictamen de 12 de julio de 1996, párr......
-
Report IACHR. Case No. 11.324 (República Dominicana)
...of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V I; Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 34, Series A no. 336; T.v.F., 27 August 1992, § 108-111, Series A no. 241-A. 33 Convención Americana, las actuaciones estatales para determinar lo ocurrido se caracterizaron por tener múltiples irregularidades, dil......
-
Report IACHR. Case No. 12.450 (Argentina)
...v. United Kingdom, J. of 29 M., 1979, Series A no. 30, para. 65; y Eur. C.H., C.o..H. v. United Kingdom, Judgment of 7 December, 1976, Series A No. 24, para. 49. O.N.U., Comité de Derechos H.nos, Aduayom y otros c. Togo (422/1990, 423/1990 y 424/1990), dictamen de 12 de julio de 1996, párr.......
-
Report IACHR. Case No. 12.554 (Venezuela)
...v. United Kingdom, J. of 29 M., 1979, Series A no. 30, para. 65; y Eur. C.H., C.o.H. v. United Kingdom, Judgment of 7 December, 1976, Series A No. 24, para. 49. O.N.U., Comité de Derechos Humanos, Aduayom y otros c. Togo (422/1990, 423/1990 y 424/1990), dictamen de 12 de julio de 1996, párr......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Religion and Freedom of Expression in the European Context
...principles underlying its judgments relating to Article 10 as set out, for example, in Handyside v. the United Kingdom (7 December 1976, Series A no. 24), and in Fressoz and Roire v. France ([GC], no. 29183/95, section 45, ECHR Freedom of expression constitutes one of the essential foundati......
-
Los derechos humanos en el constitucionalismo contemporáneo
...que es resultado de la decisión libre y autónoma de cada persona, sin que deba estar sujeta a su genitalidad» (CIIDH, Opinión Consultiva oc-24 de 24 de noviembre de 2017, párrafo 94). 60 Hernán López y Alejandra Pérez, Derechos sociales y reproductivos , cit., p. 22. 61 En este proceso infi......