Corporate governance and firm value: a comparative analysis of state and non-state owned companies in the context of Pakistan

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2017-0208
Date03 December 2018
Published date03 December 2018
Pages1196-1206
AuthorKalim Ullah Bhat,Yan Chen,Khalil Jebran,Niaz Ahmed Bhutto
Subject MatterStrategy,Corporate governance
Corporate governance and rm value:
a comparative analysis of state and
non-state owned companies in the
context of Pakistan
Kalim Ullah Bhat, Yan Chen, Khalil Jebran and Niaz Ahmed Bhutto
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examinehow corporate governance instruments impactfirm
value in the context of Pakistan. This paper considers state- and non-state-owned enterprises and
examines whether the influence of corporate governance on firm value varies across firms having
differentnature of ownership.
Design/methodology/approach This study opts for an unbalanced sample of state- and non-state-
owned enterprises for the period 2010-2014. Panel data regression is adopted for estimationof main results.
The suitable model, i.e. fixed and random effect model, is selected usingHausman specification test.
Findings The notable findings show that board independence has a significant and positive
relationship with firm value only for state-owned companies. Furthermore, the results show that market
capitalization and return on assets have a significant and positive association with firm value for both
state- and non-state-ownedenterprises. All other variablesare found insignificant for both state- and non-
state-ownedcompanies, but the results areconsistent with those reported in previousstudies.
Practical implication The findings of the study suggest that fair induction of independent directors,
appropriate boardsize and cost-benefit analysis to conduct frequentmeetings can help corporations to
improvetheir performance.
Originality/value This studyis adding to the currentliterature by providing new insights and shows that
the impact of corporategovernance on firm value varies across firms of differenttypes of ownership, i.e.
state-and non-state-owned enterprises.
Keywords Board size, Board independence, Board meetings, TobinQ
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
In developed countries, there is vast literature on the investigation of the relationship
between corporate governance and firm value, and researchers have made big debates in
specific areas (Coles and Hesterly, 2000;Pass, 2004). It is also noticed that researchers
have contributed to the literature in emerging countries where big discussions are made on
the role of corporate governance on firm performance for instance by Arora and Sharma
(2016). The need to discuss corporate governance arises as a result of some scams and
collapses in the corporate sector. Anomalies result from having a weak structure of
corporate governance, which gives rise to need for reforms to improve the corporate
governance system (Arora and Sharma, 2016), and it can ultimately help in reducing
inefficiencies in the corporate sector. Ineffective corporate governance systems play a vital
role in the occurrence of accounting scams; thus, corporations having weak governance
are more inclined to anomalies (Berkman etal., 2009).
Kalim Ullah Bhat is Doctoral
Student at the School of
Accounting, Dongbei
University of Finance and
Economics, Dalian, China.
Yan Chen is Professor and
Khalil Jebran is Doctoral
Student, both at the
Dongbei University of
Finance and Economics,
Dalian, China. Niaz Ahmed
Bhutto is Professor at the
Sukkur Institute of Business
Administration, Sukkur,
Pakistan.
Received 7 September 2017
Revised 28 March 2018
21 April 2018
7 May 2018
30 May 2018
Accepted 4 June 2018
PAGE 1196 jCORPORATE GOVERNANCE jVOL. 18 NO. 6 2018, pp. 1196-1206, ©Emerald Publishing Limited, ISSN 1472-0701 DOI 10.1108/CG-09-2017-0208

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT