Construction disputes in small to medium enterprise’s in Ireland during recession. Identification of critical factors

AuthorDavid Treacy, Paul Tansey
PositionSchool of Planning, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
Pages21-41
Construction disputes in small to
medium enterprise’s in Ireland
during recession
Identication of critical factors
David Treacy and John P. Spillane
School of Planning, Architecture and Civil Engineering,
Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK, and
Paul Tansey
Department of Civil Engineering and Construction,
Institute of Technology, Sligo, Ireland, and School of Planning,
Architecture and Civil Engineering, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to identify the critical factors causing construction disputes in small to
medium enterprises (SMEs) in Ireland during the recent recession period from 2007 to 2013.
Design/methodology/approach This study used a mixed-method approach incorporating a
literature review, case studies and questionnaire survey, with results analysed using exploratory (data
reduction) factor analysis.
Findings – The results indicate seven core critical factors which result in construction disputes in
SMEs in Ireland during a recession: payment and extras; physical work conditions; poor nancial/legal
practise; changes to the agreed scope of works; time overrun; defects; and requests for increase in speed
of project and long-term defects.
Research Limitations/implications – With Ireland emerging from the current economic recession
and the prevalence of SMEs in the construction sector, it is essential to document the core critical factors
of construction disputes which emerge within this particular segment of the built environment.
Practical Implications To address the adversarial nature of the construction sector and the
prevalence of SMEs, it is essential to identify and document the critical factors of construction disputes
within this remit. It is envisaged that the results of this research will be acknowledged, and the
recommendations adopted, by construction SMEs, particularly within Ireland, as they emerge from the
economic recession.
Originality/value This paper fulls a gap in knowledge with the emergence of the economic
recession and the identication of critical factors of construction dispute within SMEs in the Irish
construction industry.
Keywords Ireland, SME, Recession, Factor analysis, Construction disputes,
Small to medium enterprise
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
With the development and permeation of the global nancial crash in 2007 to economies
worldwide, Ireland suffered considerably and, in particular, its construction industry.
With limited government interaction to stem the disintegration of the sector within
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
www.emeraldinsight.com/1756-1450.htm
Construction
disputes
21
Received 30 October 2014
Revised 30 April 2015
Accepted 28 June 2015
InternationalJournal of Law in the
BuiltEnvironment
Vol.8 No. 1, 2016
pp.21-41
©Emerald Group Publishing Limited
1756-1450
DOI 10.1108/IJLBE-10-2014-0031
Ireland (Tansey and Spillane, 2014), small to medium enterprises (SMEs) deteriorated
and substantial job losses ensued (DKM, 2013). With this global crash and the implosion
of the Irish construction sector, signicant changes followed in the manner in which
construction stakeholders interact. With signicant restrictions in cash ow, reduced
credit facilities and limited opportunities for business, construction disputes increased.
With this changing demeanour in which the construction sector operates, there is a
necessity to review and consolidate information to identify the sources of construction
disputes in SMEs in Ireland. Spillane et al. (2011) highlight that the construction
industry in Ireland excels at dispute creation, while Tansey et al. (2014) argue that
Ireland’s construction sector has emerged negatively because of the recent economic
crash. In the context of the built environment, DKM (2013) highlights how SMEs
suffered the most and experienced signicant contraction, primarily due to their
dependence on the domestic market.
Previous research has been conducted on the Irish construction sector dispute
resolution mechanisms, but this was conducted prior to the economic downturn (Owens,
2008). Therefore, the distinctive nature and gap in knowledge that this paper fulls
assess this aspect of the Irish construction industry, but from the aspect of the recent
economic collapse. To this end, the aim of this paper is to identify the core critical factors
which result in construction disputes in SMEs in Ireland during the recession period
from 2007 to 2013. This covers both disputes between SMEs and also SMEs and their
larger counterparts. In achieving this aim, a mixed-method approach is introduced,
including a review of the effect of the economic recession on the construction sector. It is
envisaged, with the continued affection of the Irish construction sector to engage in
dispute, construction management professionals can adopt the ndings herein to aid in
the identication of critical factors of dispute in SMEs in Ireland, particularly during a
recession. Furthermore, with the continued rising cost of dispute resolution within the
built environment (Jannadia et al., 2000;Mohamed et al., 2014) and the proliferation of
disputes among parties (Murphy et al., 2014), it is essential that the industry reviews the
period of economic turmoil, in order to be better placed, when such uncertainties return
to the market. This is substantiated where Jones and Evans (2013) highlight the cyclical
nature of the UK economy and the need to encourage recovery, growth and most
importantly, develop on the failings of the past. To assist in this process and to provide
an insight into the literature on the subject, an introduction into the core published
works in this area is undertaken.
The effect of the economic recession on the construction sector and its
disputes
The global economic recession which began in the USA, was caused by an interest rate
increase in July 2007 (Knopp, 2010). On Monday, 15 September 2008, one of the largest
investment banks in the world at the time, Lehman Brothers, collapsed and led for
bankruptcy (Swedberg, 2010), signalling the acute stage of the crisis. This economic
failure sent shockwaves around the world and triggered the largest world recession
since the Great Depression of the 1930s. According to Cummins (2011, p. 9), this global
recession was triggered in the USA, mainly in the housing and property market, “[…] by
low interest rates, lenient regulation and the easy availability of credit […]” gross
domestic product, which is a reliable measure of economic status, is widely used as an
indicator of entry to, and exit from, recession (Knopp, 2010). During the economic
IJLBE
8,1
22

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT