A comparative study on the perceptions of Dutch and British Muslim leadership regarding social-political challenges

Date01 June 2023
Pages1126-1140
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-07-2022-0188
Published date01 June 2023
AuthorErtuğrul Gökçekuyu
A comparative study on the
perceptions of Dutch and British
Muslim leadership regarding
social-political challenges
Ertu
grul G
okçekuyu
Department of Political Sciences and Public Administration, Anadolu University,
Eskis
¸ehir, Turkey
Abstract
Purpose This paper aims to analyze and compare attitudes and perceptions of Muslim leadership toward
society and politics based on their personal experiences in England and the Netherlands.
Design/methodology/approach This study provides valuable insights into how Muslim leadership
experiences socio-political realities from own perspectives. The comparative analysis of Muslim leadership in
England and the Netherlands highlights the unique qualities of each community, while also demonstrating
shared communal awareness regarding political participation and concerns regarding the rise of Islamophobia
and populism.
Findings The study reveals significant differences between Dutch and British Muslim leadership regarding
attitudes toward politics. While the Dutch political system enables minorities to have political parties, British
leaders prefer peaceful resistance, internal cooperation and voting power for influence. Muslim communities in
both countries face similar challenges, such as access to politics, rising Islamophobia and populism. However,
there are variations in leadership maturity and attitudes toward communal unification and political
participation.
Research limitations/implications Especially Dutch Muslims were much more open toward cooperation
once approached. The biggest challenge was to get into the Muslim communities in England. Even though
British Muslims showed a much greater aptitude toward their civic duties, British Muslims were much more
careful and wished that interviews were written down instead of being recorded.But once the author was part
of the community, community leaders were more accepting and tolerant towards the authors presence. From
that point on, to be recommended (snowballing) became easier.
Practical implications This research shows clearly how different ethnic Muslim communities differ
across two different countries. Even though both countries have their own advantages and
disadvantages, understanding how civic responsibilities and the progressive development of minority
attitudes can be best approached is important to policymakers.
Social implications One major social implication is the way minorities perceive social and political equality
and how these minority expectations can be met. Research shows that there is much fear and anxiety to
growing sentiments of populism and right-wing appraisals. For a better integration and inclusion, a sound
assessment of social and religious expectations is crucial.
Originality/value As far as the author knows, there are no qualitative research studies that compare
Muslim minority conditions in the Netherlands and England. This research makes this even more interesting
for how to create policy that contributes to a European understanding of Muslim existence in Europe and a
common European identity. This is crucial for a more stable and stronger European future.
Keywords Muslim leadership, England, Netherlands, Political access,
Communal mobilization muslim representation, Political participation, Islamophobia, Popism
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
The Netherlands and England are home to large Muslim populations who live in their
inherent socially, culturally and politically unique diverse societies (G
ole, 2016, p. 77). From
the early onset of migration, Muslim communities in England (Gay, 1971;Glass and Pollins,
1961) and the Netherlands (Brugman, 1970;Koningsveld, 1978) were studied from ethnic and
integrationist perspectives. The political dimension, also referred to as Muslim identity
EDI
42,8
1126
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/2040-7149.htm
Received 26 July 2022
Revised 19 February 2023
6 April 2023
12 April 2023
12 April 2023
Accepted 20 April 2023
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion:
An International Journal
Vol. 42 No. 8, 2023
pp. 1126-1140
© Emerald Publishing Limited
2040-7149
DOI 10.1108/EDI-07-2022-0188

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex