Codes of Good Governance
| Author | Ruth V. Aguilera,Alvaro Cuervo‐Cazurra |
| DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00737.x |
| Published date | 01 May 2009 |
| Date | 01 May 2009 |
Codes of Good Governance
Ruth V. Aguilera and Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra*
ABSTRACT
Manuscript Type: Review
Research Question/Issue: We review the recent developments in the area of codes of good governance, a set of best practice
recommendations regarding the behavior and structure of the board of directors.
Research Findings/Results: Our review of the literature on codes of good governancehighlights their rapid spread around
the world and how academic research has lagged behind in analyzing this topic. Despite the criticism that the codes’
voluntary nature limits their ability to improve governance practices, codes of good governance appear to have generally
improved the governance of countries that have adopted them, although there is need for additional reforms.
Theoretical Implications: Unfortunately, research on codes of good governance has developed in insolation with little
cross-fertilization acrossthe different disciplines. We propose a multi-level framework to discuss three main topics that have
emerged within the codes literature: the motivations behind the diffusion of codes across countries and its implications for
convergence of corporate governance practices; the content of the codes and their “comply or explain” dimension; and the
relationship between code compliance and firm performance. We conclude by proposing four areas of future research.
Practitical Implications: Code development, adoption, and compliance are directly related to issues surrounding the
governance of the firm, and in particular to all the interactions that a director has inside and outside the firm. Codes are
regulations that emerge from policy-making negotiations between multiple stakeholders, such as the state (via the stock
market regulators) and the investors.
Keywords: Corporate Governance, Codes of Good Governance
INTRODUCTION
We review the state of information on the topic of codes
of good governance, a set of best practice recommen-
dations regarding the behavior and structure of the board
of directors. An important debate in the international corpo-
rate governance world is whether countries should develop
hard laws, such as the United States with the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act 2002, or whether soft regulation, such as codes of
good governance, are sufficiently effective to improve exist-
ing corporate governance practices across countries, as well
as to address the pressing issues of corporate accountability
and disclosure.
Although the first country to issue a code of good gover-
nance was the United States in 1978 and the second country
was Hong Kong in 1989, the pace of issuance has gathered
speed ever since, particularly after 1992 when the United
Kingdom’s Cadbury Report was issued (Cuervo-Cazurra
and Aguilera, 2004). By mid 2008, 64 countries had issued
196 distinct codes of good governance. Additionally, there is
a large variety of issuers of codes, which include not only
stock markets or its regulators, but also investor associa-
tions, employer associations, professional associations, and
even governments.
The explosion in the issuanceof codes of good governance
has been accompanied by an increase in the number of
articles in academic publications. For example, since 1997,
Corporate Governance: An International Review has published
14 papers that explicitly discuss the nature of codes in a
given country and 59 papers that have the phrase “gover-
nance code” in their abstract. Obviously, this shows that the
topic of codes of good governance is central to the field and
that there is plenty to take stock from.
However, there is little systematic analysis of how codes
of good governance have affected how corporations are
structured or how managers behave across different corpo-
rate governancesystems. For instance, a recent review of the
literature on corporate governance published in the Hand-
book of the Economics of Finance (Becht, Boltonand Roell, 2003)
*Address for correspondence: Sonoco International Business Department, University
of South Carolina, Moore School of Business, 1705 College Street, Room 557, Colum-
bia, SC 29208, USA. Tel: 1-803-777-0314; Fax: 1-803-777-3609; E-mail: acuervo@
moore.sc.edu
376
Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2009, 17(3): 376–387
© 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00737.x
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations