Citizen participation as an organisational challenge in local government

Date26 September 2023
Pages124-140
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-08-2022-0179
Published date26 September 2023
Subject MatterPublic policy & environmental management,Politics,Public adminstration & management
AuthorKaisa Kurkela,Anna–Aurora Kork,Anni Jäntti,Henna Paananen
Citizen participation as an
organisational challenge
in local government
Kaisa Kurkela
Faculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
Anna–Aurora Kork
Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
Anni J€
antti
Faculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland, and
Henna Paananen
Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
Abstract
Purpose –This study observes the organisationalenvironment of fostering citizen participation in the context
of local government. Creating systems of influential citizen participation requires the consideration of
organisational prerequisites. This study asks which organisational elements contribute to successful citizen
participation in local government.
Design/methodology/approach–The data consist of interviews with 14 key actors who work for the city of
Helsinki. The interview content was subjected to abductive content analysis and reflected in the analytical
framework based on previous literature on citizen participation. The analysis complements and adds insights
to the existing literature.
Findings –This study illuminates three crucial elements of influential citizen participation: organisational
structures, organisational culture and adequate resources. Additionally, the results revealed management to be
a crucial enabling element. The findings highlight the importance of seeing citizen participation as an issue of
governance and as a systemic part of the administration requiring intentional management efforts.
Originality/value –The study illustrates the key elements (structures, culture and resources) that should be
considered when creating an influential citizen participation system. Additionally, the empirical analysis
highlights the importance of management, which has been understudied in previous studies concerning citizen
participation.
Keywords Citizen participation, Local government, Public organisations, Interactive governance
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
Local governments are increasingly developing new methods and organisational models of
citizen participation (e.g. Falanga, 2020;Bennett et al., 2022), including a range of
participation activities and allocation of resources for organising citizen participation.
Generally, the purpose is to enhance participatory administrative activities. The success of
these models is linked to the organisational environment.
IJPSM
37,1
124
© Kaisa Kurkela, Anna–Aurora Kork, Anni J€
antti and Henna Paananen. Published by Emerald
Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0)
licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both
commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and
authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/
legalcode
Since acceptance of this article, the following author have updated their affiliations: Kaisa Kurkela
and Anna-Aurora Korka are at the School of Management, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland.
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/0951-3558.htm
Received 15 August 2022
Revised 20 April 2023
29 June 2023
22 August 2023
Accepted 24 August 2023
International Journal of Public
Sector Management
Vol. 37 No. 1, 2024
pp. 124-140
Emerald Publishing Limited
0951-3558
DOI 10.1108/IJPSM-08-2022-0179
In public administration research, citizens are considered the focal actors of governance –
for example, in discussions on new public governance (NPG) and public value (e.g. Osborne,
2010;Osborne et al., 2022). However, the issues of democracy and participation are
understudied by administrative theorists, despite these issues being at the heart of the public
nature of public administration (Nabatchi, 2010). Therefore, crossover research linking
citizen participation to organisational conditions is needed.
This article approaches citizen participation as an organisational challenge in the local
government context. We understand citizen participation from the viewpoint of participatory
democracy: citizens taking part in public planning and decision-making themselves instead of
delegating sole power to representatives in elections (Nabatchi and Amsler, 2014;Arnstein,
1969). To be more precise, participation is observed here from an institutional perspective. Local
governments are seen as institutions in which new emerging forms of democracy appear in
tangible form because they represent the closest institutional level to the daily lives of citizens
(Kurkela, 2022;Smith, 2009). Furthermore, local governments are venues in which the connection
of representative and participatory forms of democracy is essential to observe (Pratchett, 2004).
In practice, citizen participation can be understood as face-to-face participation (e.g. citizen
forums, citizen juries and citizen councils) or online participation (e.g. surveys) (Nabatchi and
Amsler, 2014). Participation can be directed at wider governanceissues, such as local government
strategies, or to more specific questions, such as small-scale questions about the city planning of
playgrounds or parks. Participation may relate to long-term processes or single activities.
The City of Helsinki, the capital of Finland, has created a participation and interaction
model that aims to make decision-making more citizen-centric and introduce opportunities
to utilise its residents’expertise and knowledge. The intention is to invite residents and
stakeholders to develop the city, its neighbourhoods andits services. City has incorporated
the principles of participation into the administrative rules of the city, so they guide the
activities of the entire city organisation. Helsinki’s participation a nd interaction mod el
offers an interesting case for studying how to organise citizen participation, as, in the
Finnish local government context, this model is relatively extensive, ambitious and well-
resourced. Moreover, the model is designed as part of the city’s management reform,
indicating the efforts made to cement citizen participation in organisational activities (see
J€
antti et al., 2023).
The case of Helsinki is an institutional attempt to enhance democracy and openness in
relation to society and local communities. However, participative methods and channels may
contradict certain rationales that have traditionally guided public organisations (Kurkela,
2022). Citizen participation attempts –such as models of citizen participation –may also leave
organisational structures and culture untouched. An organisation aiming to develop genuine
opportunities for citizens to participate must pay attention to shaping organisational
conditions (Kurkela, 2022). The literature indicate s that the development of citizen
participation requires changes to institutional culture and attitudes (e.g. Edelenbos and
van Meerkerk, 2011;Torfing et al., 2019), renewal of the organisational structures of
participation (e.g. Fung, 2006) and distribution of a range of organisational resources (e.g.
Bingham et al., 2005;Yang and Pandey, 2011;Smith and McDonough, 2001;Bryson
et al., 2012).
This study applies interactive governance forms as a lens to reflect on citizen
participation in the institutional context of local government. From an administrative
perspective, the development of participatory local government organisations is connected
to the shift from traditional governing and representative democracy to interactive modes
of governance. Interactive governance can beseenasaresponsetothedeclineofformal
representative and structured forms of participation (Boedeltje and Cornips, 2004;
Røiseland and Vabo, 2016). These responses attempt to reconvene the public audience
and opposing political views and parties in a shared discussion (Edelenbos, 2005). Paying
Citizen
participation
125

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex