Can a Teacher Salary Increase Promote Students' Educational Performance?
| Published date | 01 July 2024 |
| Author | Tianyang Liu,Baozhong Su,Jingjing Wang,Scott Rozelle |
| Date | 01 July 2024 |
| DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12543 |
©2024 Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
China & World Economy / 114–145, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2024
114
Can a Teacher Salary Increase Promote Students’
Educational Performance?
Tianyang Liu, Baozhong Su, Jingjing Wang, Scott Rozelle*
Abstract
Policymakers in China have attempted to improve the quality of rural education by
investing in teacher salaries through initiatives like the Rural Teachers Support Plan
(RTSP). This study estimates the effects of teacher salary increase on students’ educational
outcomes in rural China by utilizing the exogenous variations of rural teacher salaries
induced by the RTSP. It employs an intensity-based difference-in-differences strategy
and panel data from 2010 to 2018 with 3,351 rural children. The findings reveal that an
increase in teacher salaries had a significant positive impact on students’ examination
results. Moreover, the results of mechanism analysis indicate that salary increases could
have both quality and quantity effects on students’ outcomes by increasing the proportion of
highly educated teachers and reducing the student–teacher ratio. Our findings contribute
to the discussion on the importance of teacher salary incentives in education production
functions and provide insights for other countries undertaking rural education reforms.
Keywords: educational performance, rural children, Rural Teachers Support Plan, teacher
salary
JEL codes: I24, I28, I38
I. Introduction
Teacher quality and quantity, along with family background and school inputs, are
considered to be among the most significant determinants of student achievement in the
education production function (Hanushek et al., 2019; Glewwe et al., 2020). In recent
years, many developing countries have invested billions of dollars annually in teachers,
striving to improve the quality of education and enhance the national level of human
capital. However, in rural China, where living conditions are unfavorable, there is a
*Tianyang Liu, PhD Candidate, College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University,
China. Email: b20203110770@cau.edu.cn; Baozhong Su (corresponding author), Professor, College of
Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, China. Email: sbz@cau.edu.cn; Jingjing Wang,
Lecturer, College of Agricultural Economics and Management, Shanxi Agricultural University, China. Email:
jjw@cau.edu.cn; Scott Rozelle, Professor, Stanford Center on China’s Economy and Institutions, Stanford
University, USA. Email: rozelle@stanford.edu.
© 2024 The Author(s). China & World Economy published by John Wiley & Sons Australia,
Ltd on behalf of Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.
[Correction added on 8 February 2025, after first online publication: The copyright line was changed.]
©2024 Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
Teacher Salary Increase and Students’ Educational Performance 115
persistent shortage of teaching resources. The retention rate of rural teachers is notably
low, and many of the best teachers leave rural schools for urban institutions once their
initial contract period has been completed, or even break their contracts and leave their
teaching positions (Sargent and Hannum, 2005). According to Li et al. (2020), there was
an annual decrease of around 90,000 full-time teachers in rural schools. The loss of high-
quality teachers, especially those who have graduated from college recently, means that
most of the remaining rural teachers are older teachers who are less qualified for teaching
and feel that they are stuck in rural schools because their knowledge reserves and
teaching methods fall behind the updated teaching requirements (Wang and Gao, 2013).
One potential measure to attract and retain high-quality teachers is to provide them
with higher salaries. However, rural government and schools in China are currently
not meeting this need (Wang et al., 2011). Without sufficient salary support, rural
teaching jobs will have lower levels of professional attractiveness; in contrast, when
compensation levels are sufficiently high, teachers will have fewer personal concerns
and will be able to approach their teaching with greater focus (Reagan et al., 2019). In
2015, as a key component of the education poverty alleviation strategy, China introduced
the Rural Teachers Support Plan 2015–2020 (MOE, 2015a), aiming to invest in rural
teachers and improve the quality of rural education. The Rural Teachers Support Plan
(RTSP) includes various material and nonmaterial incentive measures but the increase
in rural teachers’ salaries stands out as the most central and crucial measure. A report on
the five-year implementation period of RTSP found that education officials at all levels
have carried out the policy and have provided significant amounts of additional financial
support for the increase in rural teachers’ salaries (Li, 2020). Our data also indicate
that the average annual increment for rural teachers’ salaries brought by this program
is about 10 percent of the average wages of employed persons in the urban nonprivate
sector in China in 2015.
However, limited research has been conducted in China to investigate whether and
to what extent the investment in teacher salaries can explain student achievements.
The extensive international literature has also not yet reached a clear consensus on this
issue, particularly concerning unconditional salary increases. Research (e.g., Hanushek,
1986) showed that there was no consistent relationship between student outcomes and
teacher pay. Studies with a more negative set of findings indicate that salary incentives
to teachers do not change the behavior of teachers and have no impact on students;
in fact, research has shown that, in public schools, higher teacher salaries may even
lower student test scores (Kingdon and Teal, 2007). By using large-scale administrative
data from Indonesia, De Ree et al. (2018) also found that unconditional teacher salary
increases did not improve teacher attendance or increase their efforts to improve their
© 2024 The Author(s). China & World Economy published by John Wiley & Sons Australia,
Ltd on behalf of Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.
Tianyang Liu et al. / 114–145, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2024
©2024 Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
116
teaching skills, thereby failing to promote student performance. Conversely, other
studies, especially those on performance-linked salary incentive programs, have
suggested a causal relationship between teacher salary growth and improvement in
student academic achievement, observed both in developing nations (Glewwe et al.,
2010; Muralidharan and Sundararaman, 2011; Contreras and Rau, 2012) and developed
countries (Lavy, 2002; Figlio and Kenny, 2007). These studies demonstrate consistently
that performance-based teacher compensation bonuses can enhance student performance
significantly in areas such as enrollment rates, exam participation rates, and standardized
test scores. Among a few studies sharing a similar contextual background as ours,
Loyalka et al. (2019) found that the incentive pattern of providing bonuses to teachers
based on students’ annual progress can contribute significantly to the improved academic
performance of Chinese pupils. However, there is currently little research estimating the
impact of the more typical unconditional teacher pay increases on students’ attainment
in China.
The aim of this paper is to estimate the impact of increasing teacher salaries on the
educational performance of rural students in China based on the exogenous variations
introduced by the RTSP to the rural teacher salaries. To do so, we used panel data from 3,351
rural children in China, collected from 2010 to 2018, to conduct an empirical analysis based
on the intensity-based difference-in-differences (DID) strategy. Specifically, we considered
the fixed salary increment quotas set by each province during the implementation of the
RTSP as the treatment intensity, and subsequently interacted it with a dummy indicating
the post-policy periods. The baseline estimation results indicate that the increase in rural
teacher salaries had a significant positive impact on children’s examination results after the
implementation of RTSP, with slightly larger effects observed in mathematics performance
compared to language performance. The patterns of the results appear consistent with the
interpretation that the salary increase has generated both quantity (fewer teachers have
left their teaching posts in rural China, and student–teacher ratios have fallen) and quality
effects (more highly educated teachers are attracted to teaching in rural schools).
This study contributes to the literature in two main ways. First, it provides crucial
evidence for the impact of an increase in teacher salary on student outcomes, especially
in the context of large-scale unconditional salary growth. These findings contribute
to the discussion concerning the importance of teacher incentives in the education
production function and provide validation to the predictions of the efficiency wage
theory (Glewwe et al., 2010; Muralidharan and Sundararaman, 2011; De Ree et al.,
2018).1 Second, as far as we are aware, it is the first empirical study, that uses a large
1The modern application of the efficiency wage theory typically refers to the prediction that higher wages may
improve productivity through various channels. For details, please refer to Akerlof (1984).
© 2024 The Author(s). China & World Economy published by John Wiley & Sons Australia,
Ltd on behalf of Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations