Board gender diversity, audit quality, and the moderating role of political connections: evidence from the Gulf Co-operation Council Countries (GCC)
| Date | 30 July 2024 |
| Pages | 828-857 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-11-2023-0286 |
| Published date | 30 July 2024 |
| Author | Abiot Tessema,Ammad Ahmed,Muhammad Kaleem Zahir-ul-Hassan |
Board gender diversity, audit
quality, and the moderating role of
political connections: evidence
from the Gulf Co-operation
Council Countries (GCC)
Abiot Tessema
Department of Accounting, College of Business, Zayed University,
Abu Dhabi Campus, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Ammad Ahmed
Department of Accounting, College of Business Administration,
University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, and
Muhammad Kaleem Zahir-ul-Hassan
Department of Accounting, College of Business, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi Campus,
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Abstract
Purpose –This study aims to examine the influenceof board gender diversity on audit quality demand,
considering auditor choice and auditefforts within the Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC) countries. It further
examines the role of political connections and the impact of gender equality policy initiatives on this
relationship.
Design/methodology/approach –Fixed-effects regression models are employed in a sample of 1,822
firm-year observations forfinancial firms across the GCC from 2011–2022 to test the hypotheses. Moreover,
the two-stage-least-squaresand the propensity score matchingmethods are used for sensitivity analysis.
Findings –The study shows a negative relationship betweenboard gender diversity and the demand for
audit quality, reflected auditor choice and audit efforts. However, the study shows a positive association
between firm’s politicalconnections and audit quality demand, which is more pronouncedin gender-diverse
boards. Policy initiatives for gender equality show no significant effect on the relationship between board
gender diversityand audit quality demand.
Practical implications –The results inform governments, policy-makers, regulatory authorities and
corporations by providingnew evidence on the relationship betweenboard gender diversity and the demand
for audit quality, as well as the moderating role of political connections and policy initiatives in this
relationship. To promote the meaningful participation of female directors in board decision-making, the
findings indicatethat gender stereotypes, both explicit and implicit,that can hinder female directors’influence
in board decision-making need to be addressed. Second, the study underscores for governments, policy-
makers regulatory authorities and corporations that the mere appointment of female directors does not
This research was supported by Zayed University Research Incentive Fund (RIF) Grant under Grant
No. R21085.
Declaration of non-conflict of interest: The authors confirm that they have no any conflict of
interest in connection to the manuscript.
IJAIM
32,5
828
Received14 November 2023
Revised4 February 2024
Accepted22 June 2024
InternationalJournal of
Accounting& Information
Management
Vol.32 No. 5, 2024
pp. 828-857
© Emerald Publishing Limited
1834-7649
DOI 10.1108/IJAIM-11-2023-0286
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/1834-7649.htm
necessarily ensure their engagementin board decision-making. The appointment of female directors should
go beyond symbolismand translate into meaningful engagement and influencewith the board.
Originality/value –This studycontributes to the corporate governance literatureby offering new insights
on the link between boardgender diversity and the demand for audit quality.Beyond confirming a negative
relationship between board gender diversity and the demand for quality audit, this study provides new
insights on the moderating role of a firm’s political connections on this relationship. In addition, existing
studies are primarily based on firms in Western countries and cannot be generalized due to differences in
governanceand legal structures. Given that the GCC countrieshave different cultures, economies, institutions,
governance practicesand norms compared to developed and emerging countries, our study offers a pertinent
discussionon the relationship between board gender diversity and the demand for audit quality,as well as the
moderatingrole of political connections in this relationshipin the GCC countries.
Keywords Board gender diversity, Audit fee, Audit quality, Political connections,
Corporate governance, GCC
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
Established in 1981, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) comprises Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman,
Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), with the primary goals of fostering
economic and political collaboration, enhancing regional stability, addressing common
challenges and strengthening collective bargaining power on the international stage
(Benbouziane and Benmar, 2010;Al-Yahyaee et al., 2017). Over the years, the organization has
played a crucial role in fostering economic integration, joint defence initiatives and coordination
on various political issues, contributing to the overall development and cohesion of the member
states (Al-Yahyaee et al., 2017). As oil-rich countries, the GCC nations have leveraged their
abundant natural resources to drive economic growth and diversification strategies. The region
exhibits distinctive cultural, religious and societal characteristics that differentiate them from
Western societies. With a deep connection to a diverse Arabheritage, these countries prioritize
traditional values, familial bonds and communal responsibilities, while facing issues like
gender inequality and the impact of political connections (Al-Shammari et al.,2008).
Recently, governments in the Gulf Co-operation Council Countries (GCC) have been
strongly pushing the gender equality agenda and encouraging companies to consider the
issue of gender diversity. Given the differences in culture, economics, institutions,
governance practices, and norms in comparison to developed countries and emerging
countries, we argue that it is ultimately an empirical issue whether board gender diversity
affects a firm’s outcomesin this context. Therefore, the purpose of this study is twofold:
(1) to examine whether board gender diversity influences the demand for higher audit
quality using a sample of firms from the GCC region; and
(2) to investigate the moderating role of firm’s political connections and the impact of
gender equality policy initiatives on the influence of board gender diversity on the
demand for higher audit quality.
Gender diversity on corporate boards has significantly gained importance, and the
female directors’underrepresentation on such boards has been a longstanding concern
in many countries and industries over the last decades (Schneid et al., 2015). Some
countries have introduced quotas and requirements to encourage gender diversity on
boards. For example, the European Union has enacted legislation mandating
corporations to increase gender diversity on theirboards (Carte r etal ., 2003;Adams and
Ferreira, 2009;Lai et al., 2017). Motivated by these initiatives, prior studies examine the
impact of board gender diversity and show that gender diverse boards are more likely
Moderating
role of political
connections
829
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations