Bibliografía consultada

Pages455-494
AuthorCarlos Manuel Rosales
Bibliografía
consultada
455
Abramson, Jeffrey. We the jury. Harvard University Press. USA.2001.
Ackerman, Bruce, We the people. Foundations, Harvard University
Press, USA, 1991.
Ackerman, Bruce, “The new separation of powers”, Harvard Law Re-
view, Vol.113, No.3, Cambridge, 2008.
Águila, Rafael, Manual de ciencia política. Trotta, Madrid, 2000.
Ai Camp, Roderic, La democracia en América Latina. Siglo XXI, México,
1997.
Alderman, Ellen. The right to privacy. Knopf. New York. 1995.
Andrade Martínez, Virgilio, “Balance y perspectivas de la justicia elec-
toral en México”, en Evolución histórica de las instituciones de la
justicia electoral en México”. TEPJF, México, 2002.
Ansolabehere, Karina, La política desde la justicia. Fontamara, México, 2007.
Anselmino, Valeria, “La división o separación de poderes”, Revista Ana-
les de la Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales, Año 13, No.46,
Argentina, 2016.
Arellano García, Carlos, Teoría general del proceso. Porrúa, México, 1992.
Atienza, Manuel, Las razones del derecho. UNAM, México, 2005.
Baldwin, John y McConville, Michael. Jury Trials. Clarendon Press.
Oxford. 1979.
ANÁLISIS DEL DOGMATISMO UTÓPICO DE LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS
CARLOS MANUEL ROSALES
456
Barnett, Randy, Restoring the lost constitution, Princeton University
Press, USA, 2004.
Barreiro Pereira, Francisco Javier, en Sistemas de Justicia Electoral.
TEPJF, México, 1999.
Bastida I. Francisco, Jueces y franquismo. Ariel. Derecho, Barcelona,
1986.
Baumgartner, Frank, Lobbying and policy changes. University of Chica-
go Press, 2009.
Berlin, Isaiah, Four essays on liberty, Oxford, England, 1969.
Berman, Harold. Law & Revolution. Harvard University Press. Cambri-
dge. 1999.
Bernstein, David. You can’t say that. Cato Institute. Washington. 2000.
Bickel, Alexander M., The least dangerous power, Yale University Press,
USA, 1986.
Biscaretti di Rufa, Paolo, Introducción al derecho constitucional com-
parado, Traductor: Héctor Fix-Zamudio, 2ª. reimpresión. FCE,
México, 2000.
Bix, Brian, Jurisprudence. Carolina Academic Press, USA, 2004.
Bix, Brian H., Diccionario de teoría jurídica. UNAM-IIJ, México, 2009.
Bobbio, Norberto, Dicionário de política, UnB, 11ª. Edición, Brasil, 1983.
Bobbio, Norberto, El tiempo de los derechos, Sistema, Madrid, 1990.
Bobbio, Norberto, El futuro de la democracia. FCE, México, 1998.
Böckenforde, Ernst Wolfgang, Estudios sobre el estado de derecho y la
democracia. Trotta, Madrid, 2000.
Bonilla Núñez, Samuel, “Derecho de acceso a la información pública.
Un derecho en construcción”, Revista Justicia. Punto de Equili-
brio, México, 2008.
BIBLIOGRAFÍA CONSULTADA
457
Bonilla, Daniel, “La arquitectura conceptual del principio de separación
de poderes”, Revista Universitas, No.131, Colombia, 2015.
Bovero, Michelangelo, Los adjetivos de la democracia. IFE, México, 2000.
Bravo García, Ramiro “Las innovaciones al sistema de lo contencioso
electoral” Revista Teoría y praxis administrativa, Volumen 3, Nú-
mero 3, México, 1987.
Brown, Archibald. New Law Dictionary. Steven and Haynes. London. 1874.
Caballero, Antonio José, “La transición del absolutismo al Estado mo-
derno”, en Transiciones y diseños institucionales, en López Ayllón,
Sergio (editor). UNAM, México, 2000.
Caballero Juárez, José Antonio y Concha Cantú, Hugo Alejandro, Diag-
nóstico sobre la administración de Justicia en las entidades fede-
rativas. UNAM-IIJ, México, 2002.
Cabo de la Vega, Antonio, Lo público como supuesto constitucional.
UNAM, México, 1997.
Canto Presuel, Jesús, Diccionario Electoral, TEQROO, México, 2008.
Carpizo, Jorge, El presidencialismo mexicano. Siglo XXI, México, 1987.
Carpizo, Jorge, Concepto de democracia y sistema de gobierno en
América Latina. UNAM, México, 2006.
Carrasco Daza, Constancio, “Más allá de la confrontación de ideas en
los debates políticos” en Lex: Difusión y Análisis, Tercera época,
Año XI, No.146, México, 2007.
Castillo González, Leonel, Reflexiones temáticas sobre derecho electo-
ral. TEPJF, México, 2006.
Cassidy, Bryan, European Lobbying Guide. Thorogood, London, 1999.
Chiovenda, Giuseppe, Instituciones de Derecho Procesal Civil, Volumen
II. Cárdenas, México, 1989.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex