Beyond Dichotomy: The Curvilinear Impact of Employee Ownership on Firm Performance
| DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00703.x |
| Published date | 01 September 2008 |
| Author | Zied Guedri,Xavier Hollandts |
| Date | 01 September 2008 |
Beyond Dichotomy: The Curvilinear Impact of
Employee Ownership on Firm Performance
Zied Guedri* and Xavier Hollandts
ABSTRACT
Manuscript type: Empirical
Research Question/Issue: This study examines the impact of employee stock ownership and board employee representa-
tion on firm performance.
Research Findings/Results: Results drawn from a longitudinal analysis of a sample of 230 French firms over the period
2000–2005 provide support for an inverted U-shaped relationship between employee ownership and accounting-based
performance measures. However, this relationship is not supported when a market-based performance measure is used. We
also found that the inflection point of the inverted U-shaped relationship between employee ownership and firm perfor-
mance does not depend upon the level of employee representation on the board.
Theoretical Implications: This study addresses the inconsistency of results found so far in the literature examining the
performance implications of employee ownership by proposing a theoretical framework and providing empirical support
for the hypothesis suggesting that the relationship between employee ownership and firm performance is not linear, but
indeed, has an inverted U-shape.
Practical Implications: In a governance context characterized by a spectacular increase in employee ownership fostered by
a pervasive support from both managers and government, our results suggest that performance implications of employee
ownership are positive up to a certain point, after which the marginal effect of employee ownership on firm performance
becomes negative. As a result, our findings suggest that managers and shareholders should be careful when launching and
increasing the level of employee ownership to not go beyond specific inflection points.
Keywords: Board Composition, Board of Directors Issues, France, Ownership Issues
INTRODUCTION
Employee ownership, defined as ownership of company
stock by employees through broad-based ownership
mechanisms such as Employee Stock Ownership Plan
(ESOP), stock awards, and stock purchase plans, has become
a widespread phenomenon during the last two decades. In
the US, the number of employees owning stocks of firms for
which they work has been estimated at 25 million – approxi-
mately 24 per cent of the total number of private sector
employees (NCEO, 2005). Employee ownership is not only
growing in the US but also worldwide. In Europe, the
number of employee stock owners has been estimated at 17
million, which represents 19 per cent of the total number of
private sector employees (Perotin and Robinson, 2002). In
France, the number of employee stock owners has increased
from 700,000 in 1998 to 3 million in 2005 (FAS, 2006). This
increased popularity has been the result of pervasive
support from both executive managers and governments
(Kruse, 2002). Governments have encouraged employee
ownership for its sustained positive macrolevel effects on
both economic growth and employment (Weitzman, 1985).
Executive managers have encouraged the adoption of
employee ownership for its positive effect on employee
productivity, cooperation, and information sharing (Blasi,
Conte and Kruse, 1996).
While empirical support for the positive impact of
employee ownership on employee behavior such as motiva-
tion (Long, 1978a, 1978b; Pierce, Rubenfeld and Morgan,
1991), satisfaction (Hammer and Stern, 1980; Long, 1980;
French and Rosenstein, 1984; Klein, 1987), and level of
involvement in the task (Frohlich, Godard, Oppenheimer
and Starker, 1998) has been extensive, the linear positive
relationship between employee ownership and firm
*Address for correspondence: E M Lyon,Strategy and Business Policy Department, 23
AvenueGuy de Collongue – BP 174 – 69132 Ecully Cedex. Tel: 00 33 478337005; Fax:00
33 478337925; E-mail: guedri@em-lyon.com
460 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Volume 16 Number 5 September 2008 © 2008 TheAuthors
Journal compilation © 2008 BlackwellPublishing Ltd
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00703.x
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations