Asset‐Liability Management and bank profitability: Statistical cost accounting analysis from an emerging market

Date01 January 2021
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1860
Published date01 January 2021
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Asset-Liability Management and bank profitability:
Statistical cost accounting analysis from an emerging
market
Freeman Brobbey Owusu
1
| Abdul Latif Alhassan
2
1
Department of Accounting and Finance,
Sheffield Business School, Sheffield
Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
2
Development Finance Centre (DEFIC),
Graduate School of Business, University of
Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Correspondence
Freeman B. Owusu, Department of
Accounting and Finance, Sheffield
Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Email: f.b.owusu@shu.ac.uk
Abstract
This paper employs the Statistical Cost Accounting (SCA) model to examine
the relationship between profit and Asset-Liability Management (ALM) struc-
ture of 27 banks in Ghana over the period 20072015. The findings confirm
the central hypothesis of the SCA model and provide evidence that profitability
is linked to balance sheet items in Ghana. It also documents evidence that
domestic banks have higher rate of return on assets than foreign banks over
the study period. In addition, high profit banks were observed to have higher
rate of return on assets as well as higher rate of cost on liabilities than low
profit banks. These findings provide useful insights to bank management
through the identification of the assets items that generate highest return on
bank profitability.
KEYWORDS
Asset and Liability Management, banking, Profitability, Statistical Cost Accounting
1|INTRODUCTION
The economic growth of every country is influenced
greatly by the activities of banks. Thus, a sound banking
system is essential for the economic development of every
nation (Ayadi, Arbak, Naceur, & De Groen, 2015;
Goodhart, 2004). For most African countries with thin
and illiquid stock markets (see Allen, Otchere, &
Senbet, 2011), the banking industry remains the main
financial intermediary through which funds are trans-
ferred from surplus units to deficit units for productive
use. Hence, failure of the banking system will generate
serious negative externalities for the rest of the economy
(Morris & Turner, 1996). Banking crises and failures in
developing economies far outweigh those in developed
economies (Caprio & Klingebiel, 1996). According to
Morris and Turner (1996), banking problems in the
developing economies have dire consequences for the
domestic economies and rippling effect on other coun-
tries as a result of the integration of financial markets
globally.
Through prudent management of assets and liabili-
ties, banks are able to ensure going concern. Poor Asset
and Liability Management (ALM) has been identified as
one of the root causes of bank failures (Daumont, Le
Gall, & Leroux, 2004; Kapur, Hadjimichael, Hilber, &
Szymczak, 1991). ALM involves the strategic manage-
ment of the assets and liabilities of an institution (bank)
to optimize profitability, improve liquidity, and to protect
it against various bank risks (Brick, 2014). It is an indis-
pensable part of risk management, which is at the very
core of financial management of banks. ALM goes
Received: 24 October 2018 Revised: 13 October 2019 Accepted: 18 June 2020
DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.1860
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original work is properly cited.
© 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Finance & Economics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
1488 Int J Fin Econ. 2021;26:14881502.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/ijfe

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT