Anatomy of a mass resignation: moral entrepreneurship and academic outsiders within

Date17 January 2025
Pages42-52
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-08-2024-0375
Published date17 January 2025
AuthorMilena Tekeste,Mustafa F. Özbilgin
Anatomy of a mass resignation:
moral entrepreneurship and
academic outsiders within
Milena Tekeste
Division of Social Science, New York University Abu Dhabi,
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, and
Mustafa F.
Ozbilgin
Brunel University London, London, UK
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this viewpoint is to examine the claims made in the resignation letter and global
petition surrounding the mass resignation of editorial members from the journal Gender, Work and
Organization. It aims to shed light on the overlooked voices that criticized the boycott and to reflect on how the
protest, while addressing legitimate concerns, inadvertently marginalized early-career and minoritized scholars,
undermining principles of Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI).
Design/methodology/approach The authors adopted a reflexive methodology, engaging with a globally
diverse set of junior, mid-career and senior scholars to gather their insights on the unfolding events.
By intentionally seeking out those critical of the resignation, the authors emphasized their positionality as scholars
committed to fostering inclusivity and fairness. They positioned themselves against the instrumentalization of
social justice rhetoric, critiquing how it disproportionately impacted vulnerable academic communities.
Findings The viewpoint highlights how the mass resignation and academic boycott of Gender, Work and
Organization failed to account for its adverse effects on early-career and marginalized scholars, missing
opportunities for feminist care and solidarity.It argues that the boycott, while signalling virtue, had a polarizing
impact and overlooked key principles of EDI, leading to unintended negative consequences.
Originality/value The originality of this viewpoint lies in its focus on the often-unheard voices of scholars who
opposed the mass resignation and academic boycott of Gender, Work and Organization, offering a counter-
narrative to the widely publicized protest. Its value comes from critically examining how actions intended to
promote social justice and equality can inadvertently harm early-career and marginalized scholars. By spotlighting
these complexities and challenging the virtue signalling behind the boycott, the critique contributes to ongoing
discussions on the ethical responsibilities of academic activism, solidarity and inclusivity in feminist scholarship.
Keywords Mass resignation, Moral entrepreneurship, Academic boycott
Paper type Viewpoint
Introduction
In early March 2024, a resignation letter (see Appendix) was circulated through various virtual
channels informing the academic community that some members of the editorial board of the
academic journal, Gender,Work and Organization (GWO) felt compelled to resign from their
positions to safeguard the quality and impact of gender scholarship. One of the editors-in-chief
(EICs) and a number of associate editors (AEs) led the effort, including the creation of a global
petition that called for wider support of their cause. In this contribution, we critique the claims
made in their resignation letter and petition. While the voices of those who have resigned from
the journal are plentiful and heard, we present the relatively unheard voices that have criticized
the mass resignation. We also include our conversations with a globally-diverse set of junior,
mid-career and senior scholars, as we collectively reflect on the unfolding of the mass
resignation. To accentuate these marginalized voices, we approached several scholars who
EDI
44,9
42
© Milena Tekeste and Mustafa F.
Ozbilgin. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is
published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce,
distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial
purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license
may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/2040-7149.htm
Received 24 August 2024
Revised 21 October 2024
26 November 2024
Accepted 28 November 2024
Equality,Diversity and Inclusion: An
InternationalJournal
Vol.44 No. 9, 2025
pp.42-52
EmeraldPublishing Limited
e-ISSN:2040-7157
p-ISSN:2040-7149
DOI10.1108/EDI-08-2024-0375

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex