-
European Court of Human Rights › Judgment (Preliminary Objection)
29 results for European Court of Human Rights › Judgment (Preliminary Objection)
-
vLex Rating
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of Court (Grand Chamber), March 25, 2014 (case CASE OF VUČKOVIĆ AND OTHERS v. SERBIA)
Preliminary objection allowed (Article 35-1 - Effective domestic remedy)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of Court (Grand Chamber), March 25, 2014 (case CASE OF VUČKOVIĆ AND OTHERS v. SERBIA)
Preliminary objection allowed (Article 35-1 - Effective domestic remedy)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of Court (Grand Chamber), June 29, 2012 (case CASE OF SABRÄ° GÃNEÅ v. TURKEY)
Preliminary objection allowed (Article 35-1 - Six month period)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of Court (Grand Chamber), June 29, 2012 (case CASE OF SABRİ GÜNEŞ v. TURKEY)
Preliminary objection allowed (Article 35-1 - Six month period)
- Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of European Court of Human Rights, April 10, 2012 (case CASE OF BEKAURI v. GEORGIA)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of Court (Second Section), April 10, 2012 (case CASE OF BEKAURI v. GEORGIA)
Preliminary objection allowed (Article 35-3 - Abuse of the right of petition)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of Court (Second Section), October 18, 2005 (case CASE OF SIDDIK ASLAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY)
Preliminary objection allowed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of Court (Third Section), October 07, 2004 (case CASE OF VATAN v. RUSSIA)
Preliminary objection allowed (lack of victim status) Inadmissible
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of Court (Grand Chamber), May 06, 2003 (case CASE OF TAHSIN ACAR v. TURKEY)
Government’s request to strike the application out of the list rejected
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of Court (Third Section), January 30, 2001 (case CASE OF HOLZINGER v. AUSTRIA (No. 1))
Preliminary objection allowed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of Court (Third Section), January 30, 2001 (case CASE OF PALLANICH v. AUSTRIA)
Preliminary objection allowed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of Court (Third Section), January 30, 2001 (case CASE OF BASIC v. AUSTRIA)
Preliminary objection allowed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of Court (Grand Chamber), September 28, 1999 (case CASE OF CIVET v. FRANCE)
Lack of jurisdiction (complaint inadmissible)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of European Court of Human Rights, September 23, 1998 (case CASE OF AYTEKIN v. TURKEY)
Preliminary objection allowed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of European Court of Human Rights, February 19, 1998 (case CASE OF BAHADDAR v. THE NETHERLANDS)
Preliminary objection allowed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of European Court of Human Rights, March 20, 1997 (case CASE OF BEIS v. GREECE)
Preliminary objection allowed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of European Court of Human Rights, November 15, 1996 (case CASE OF AHMET SADIK v. GREECE)
Preliminary objection allowed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of European Court of Human Rights, August 07, 1996 (case CASE OF YAĞIZ v. TURKEY)
Preliminary objection allowed (ratione temporis) Not necessary to examine preliminary objection (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of European Court of Human Rights, June 08, 1995 (case CASE OF KEFALAS AND OTHERS v. GREECE)
Preliminary objection allowed (ratione temporis)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of Court (Grand Chamber), March 23, 1995 (case CASE OF LOIZIDOU v. TURKEY (PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS))
Question of procedure rejected (locus standi of the applicant Government) Preliminary objection rejected (abuse of process) Preliminary objection rejected (ratione loci) Preliminary objection joined to merits (ratione temporis)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of European Court of Human Rights, October 26, 1993 (case CASE OF STAMOULAKATOS v. GREECE (No. 1))
Preliminary objection allowed (ratione temporis) Preliminary objection allowed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of European Court of Human Rights, September 22, 1993 (case CASE OF GOISIS v. ITALY)
Preliminary objection allowed (out of time)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of European Court of Human Rights, September 22, 1993 (case CASE OF ISTITUTO DI VIGILANZA v. ITALY)
Preliminary objection allowed (out of time)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of European Court of Human Rights, September 22, 1993 (case CASE OF FIGUS MILONE v. ITALY)
Preliminary objection allowed (out of time)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of European Court of Human Rights, August 27, 1992 (case CASE OF VIJAYANATHAN AND PUSPARAJAH v. FRANCE)
Preliminary objection allowed (victim)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of European Court of Human Rights, March 19, 1991 (case CASE OF CARDOT v. FRANCE)
Lack of jurisdiction (complaint inadmissible)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of European Court of Human Rights, November 06, 1980 (case CASE OF VAN OOSTERWIJCK v. BELGIUM)
Preliminary objection allowed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of European Court of Human Rights, February 09, 1967 (case CASE \)
Preliminary objection rejected (incompatibility)
-
Judgment (Preliminary Objection) of European Court of Human Rights, November 14, 1960 (case CASE OF LAWLESS v. IRELAND (No. 1))
Preliminary objection rejected (incompatibility) Questions of procedure rejected