Decisión del Panel Administrativo nº D2016-1681 of WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, October 14, 2016 (case SnoopBy Co Ltd. v. Fu Ze Yang aka Yang Fu Ze / YinSi BaoHu Yi KaiQi (Hidden by Whois Privacy Protection Service))

• Resolution Date: October 14, 2016
• Issuing Organization: WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
• Decision: Transfer
• Dominio: Generic Domains

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center

ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION

SnoopBy Co Ltd. v. Fu Ze Yang aka Yang Fu Ze / YinSi BaoHu Yi KaiQi (Hidden by Whois Privacy Protection Service)

Case No. D2016-1681

1. The Parties

The Complainant is SnoopBy Co Ltd. of Seoul, Republic of Korea, represented by Crowell & Moring, LLP, Belgium.

The Respondent is Fu Ze Yang aka Yang Fu Ze of Putian, Fujian, China / YinSi BaoHu Yi KaiQi (Hidden by Whois Privacy Protection Service) of Beijing, China.

2. The Domain Names and Registrar

The disputed domain names [gentlemonstereyeglasses.com], [gentlemonstereyewear.com], [gentlemonsterfashion.com], [gentlemonsteronline.com], [gentlemonsteroriginal.com], [gentlemonstershop.net], [gentlemonstershopping.com], [gentlemonsterstore.com], [gentlemonstersunglass.com] and [gentlemonstersunglasses.com] are registered with HiChina Zhicheng Technology Ltd. (the "Registrar").

3. Procedural History

The Complaint was filed in English with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the "Center") on August 18, 2016. On August 18, 2016, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain names. On August 19 and August 23, 2016, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification responses disclosing registrant and contact information for the disputed domain names which differed from the named Respondent and contact information in the Complaint. The Center sent an email communication to the Complainant on August 23, 2016 providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar, and inviting the Complainant to submit an amendment to the Complaint. The Complainant filed an amended Complaint on August 30, 2016.

On August 23, 2016, the Center sent an email communication to the Parties in both Chinese and English regarding the language of the proceeding. On August 30, 2016, the Complainant requested that English be the language of the proceeding. The Respondent did not comment on the language of the proceeding by the specified due date.

The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").

In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified the Respondent in both Chinese and English of the Complaint, and the proceeding commenced on September 2, 2016. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was September 22, 2016. The Respondent did not submit any response. Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent's default on September 23, 2016.

The Center...