Decisión del Panel Administrativo nº D2006-0625 de Tribunal Arbitral de la OMPI, 8 de Septiembre de 2006 (caso Shoulderdoc Limited vs. Vertical Axis, Inc)
Enlazado como:
Enlazado como:
Resumen
[shoulderdoc.com]
Ver el contenido completo de este documento
Extracto
Decisión del Panel Administrativo nº D2006-0625 de Tribunal Arbitral de la OMPI, 8 de Septiembre de 2006 (caso Shoulderdoc Limited vs. Vertical Axis, Inc)
Shoulderdoc Limited v. Vertical Axis, Inc
Case No. D2006-0625 1. The Parties The Complainant is Shoulderdoc Limited, Manchester Sports Medicine Clinic, Manchester, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by Pannone LLP, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The Respondent is Vertical Axis, Inc, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea, represented by ESQwire.com Law Firm, United States of America. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name [shoulderdoc.com] is registered with Nameview Inc. 3. Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the "Center") on May 19, 2006. On May 19, 2006, the Center transmitted by email to Nameview Inc. a request for registrar verification in connection with the domain name at issue. On May 23, 2006, Nameview Inc. transmitted by email to the Center its verification response confirming that the Respondent is listed as the registrant and providing the contact details for ...Ver el contenido completo de este documento
Enlaces patrocinados
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. Todos los Derechos Reservados.
Contenidos en vLex Derecho Internacional
Explora vLex
Para Profesionales
Para Socios
Otros documentos:
New Post of Adg Lo Ii Created [Lucknow] | come for cost, stay for innovation ; thus far, multinational it companies have been drawn to india for its low-cost advantages. but n... | Acordão de Tribunal Regional do Trabalho 4ª Região Porto Alegre RS November 05 2009 | Acórdão nº 70031759350 de Tribunal de Justiça do RS, Décima Nona Câmara Cível, November 24, 2009