Decisión del Panel Administrativo nº D2004-0496 de Tribunal Arbitral de la OMPI, 14 de Agosto de 2004 (caso Mamas & Papas vs. QTK Internet)
Enlazado como:
Resumen
mamasandpapas.com
Ver el contenido completo de este documento
Extracto
Decisión del Panel Administrativo nº D2004-0496 de Tribunal Arbitral de la OMPI, 14 de Agosto de 2004 (caso Mamas & Papas vs. QTK Internet)
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Mamas & Papas (Holdings) Limited, Mamas & Papas (Retail) Limited v. QTK Internet/Name Proxy Case No. D2004-0496 1. The Parties The Complainants are Mamas & Papas (Holdings) Limited, Mamas & Papas (Retail) Limited, Huddersfield, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by Martineau Johnson, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The Respondent is QTK Internet/Name Proxy, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with BulkRegister.com. 3. Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the "Center") on July 6, 2004. On July 7, 2004, the Center transmitted by email to BulkRegister.com a request for registrar verification in connection with the domain name at issue. On July 7, 2004, BulkRegister.com transmitted by email to the Center its verification response confirming that the Respondent is listed as the registrant and providing the contact details for the administrative, billing, and technical contact. The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules"). In accordance with the Rules, Paragraphs 2(a) and 4(a), the Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on July 9, 2004. In accordance with the Rules, Paragraph 5(a), the due date for Response was July 29, 2004. The Respondent did not submit any response. Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent's default on July 30, 2004. The Center appointed Anthony R. Connerty as the sole panelist in thi...
Ver el contenido completo de este documento
Enlaces patrocinados
