Decisión del Panel Administrativo nº D2008-0409 de Tribunal Arbitral de la OMPI, 23 de Mayo de 2008 (caso First SBF Holding, Inc. v. XC2)
Enlazado como:
Enlazado como:
Resumen
[eterna.com]
Ver el contenido completo de este documento
Extracto
Decisión del Panel Administrativo nº D2008-0409 de Tribunal Arbitral de la OMPI, 23 de Mayo de 2008 (caso First SBF Holding, Inc. v. XC2)
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION First SBF Holding, Inc. v. XC2 Case No. D2008-0409 1. The Parties 1.1 The Complainant is First SBF Holding, Inc., of New York, United States of America, represented by Weiss & Arons LLP, United States of America. 1.2 The Respondent is XC2, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China, represented by Greenberg & Lieberman, United States of America. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 2.1 The disputed domain name [eterna.com] (the "Domain Name") is registered with Moniker Online Services, LLC (the "Registrar"). 3. Procedural History 3.1 The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the "Center") on March 14, 2008. At that time the Who-Is record for the Domain Name recorded the registrant as "Moniker Privacy Services" and that was the entity named as the Respondent in the Complaint. 3.2 On March 17, 2008, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the Domain Name. On March 19, 2008, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response. According to the Registrar, the registrant for the Domain Name was "XC2" with a P.O. Box address in Hong Kong. The technical and administrative email contact given by the Registrar was "[Gary Lam sales@xc2.com]". 3.3 In light of the information provided by the Registrar as to the identity of the registrant, the Center invited the Complainant to amend its Complaint. The Complainant duly filed an amendment to the Complaint on March 25, 2008. Subsequently the Complainant filed a correction to the Amendment of the Complaint on March 28, 2008. The Complaint as amended named both "Moniker Privacy Services" and XC2 as the Respondent. The Panel ...Ver el contenido completo de este documento
Enlaces patrocinados
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. Todos los Derechos Reservados.
Contenidos en vLex Derecho Internacional
Explora vLex
Para Profesionales
Para Socios
Otros documentos:
Decisión del Panel Administrativo nº D2004-0575 de Tribunal Arbitral de la OMPI, October 01, ... | Decisión del Panel Administrativo nº DRO2004-0001 de Tribunal Arbitral de la OMPI June 03 2004 caso Oficiul National al Registrului Comertului vs Kurtyan Co... | Decisión del Panel Administrativo nº DTV2003-0007 de Tribunal Arbitral de la OMPI, February 17, 2004 (caso VORTEX vs. Nasedine Mecheri) | Decisión del Panel Administrativo nº DBZ2003-0003 de Tribunal Arbitral de la OMPI, August 25, 2003 (caso Consitex S.A v... | acórdão nº 0008574-87.2009.4.01.3603 de tribunal regional federal da 1a região quarta turma ... | Cabral quer menos PMs dentro dos quartéis | Acórdãos nº 253567 de TJSP. Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo, October 06, 2011 | Acórdãos nº 181406 de TJSP Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo October 13 2...